diff src/SbpOperators/boundaryops/boundary_operator.jl @ 1153:f1bb1b6d85dd refactor/sbpoperators/inflation

Review: Suggest changes to test and removal of conveninece constructor
author Vidar Stiernström <vidar.stiernstrom@it.uu.se>
date Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:33:27 +0200
parents 5ddf5ae48391
children ae006e844870
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/src/SbpOperators/boundaryops/boundary_operator.jl	Fri Oct 21 23:07:30 2022 +0200
+++ b/src/SbpOperators/boundaryops/boundary_operator.jl	Tue Oct 25 10:33:27 2022 +0200
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@
 
 BoundaryOperator{R}(stencil::Stencil{T,N}, size::Int) where {T,R,N} = BoundaryOperator{T,R,N}(stencil, size)
 # TBD: Will the above convenience constructor ever be used?
+# Review: 
+# It should probably be removed. It's kind of weird to have a convenice constructor
+# for a general type if it isnt used by any of the current specializations. And in most cases the 1D constructor
+# can be inflated.
 
 """
     BoundaryOperator(grid::EquidistantGrid{1}, closure_stencil, region)