diff DiffOps/src/DiffOps.jl @ 211:1ad91e11b1f4 package_refactor

Move DiffOps and Grids into packages
author Jonatan Werpers <jonatan@werpers.com>
date Wed, 26 Jun 2019 10:44:20 +0200
parents diffOp.jl@bcd2029c590d
children 3a93d8a799ce
line wrap: on
line diff
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/DiffOps/src/DiffOps.jl	Wed Jun 26 10:44:20 2019 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+abstract type DiffOp end
+
+# TBD: The "error("not implemented")" thing seems to be hiding good error information. How to fix that? Different way of saying that these should be implemented?
+function apply(D::DiffOp, v::AbstractVector, i::Int)
+    error("not implemented")
+end
+
+function innerProduct(D::DiffOp, u::AbstractVector, v::AbstractVector)::Real
+    error("not implemented")
+end
+
+function matrixRepresentation(D::DiffOp)
+    error("not implemented")
+end
+
+abstract type DiffOpCartesian{Dim} <: DiffOp end
+
+# DiffOp must have a grid of dimension Dim!!!
+function apply!(D::DiffOpCartesian{Dim}, u::AbstractArray{T,Dim}, v::AbstractArray{T,Dim}) where {T,Dim}
+    for I ∈ eachindex(D.grid)
+        u[I] = apply(D, v, I)
+    end
+
+    return nothing
+end
+
+function apply_region!(D::DiffOpCartesian{2}, u::AbstractArray{T,2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}) where T
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Lower, Lower)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Lower, Interior)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Lower, Upper)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Interior, Lower)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Interior, Interior)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Interior, Upper)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Upper, Lower)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Upper, Interior)
+    apply_region!(D, u, v, Upper, Upper)
+    return nothing
+end
+
+# Maybe this should be split according to b3fbef345810 after all?! Seems like it makes performance more predictable
+function apply_region!(D::DiffOpCartesian{2}, u::AbstractArray{T,2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}, r1::Type{<:Region}, r2::Type{<:Region}) where T
+    for I ∈ regionindices(D.grid.size, closureSize(D.op), (r1,r2))
+        @inbounds indextuple = (Index{r1}(I[1]), Index{r2}(I[2]))
+        @inbounds u[I] = apply(D, v, indextuple)
+    end
+    return nothing
+end
+
+function apply_tiled!(D::DiffOpCartesian{2}, u::AbstractArray{T,2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}) where T
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Lower, Lower)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Lower, Interior)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Lower, Upper)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Interior, Lower)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Interior, Interior)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Interior, Upper)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Upper, Lower)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Upper, Interior)
+    apply_region_tiled!(D, u, v, Upper, Upper)
+    return nothing
+end
+
+using TiledIteration
+function apply_region_tiled!(D::DiffOpCartesian{2}, u::AbstractArray{T,2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}, r1::Type{<:Region}, r2::Type{<:Region}) where T
+    ri = regionindices(D.grid.size, closureSize(D.op), (r1,r2))
+    # TODO: Pass Tilesize to function
+    for tileaxs ∈ TileIterator(axes(ri), padded_tilesize(T, (5,5), 2))
+        for j ∈ tileaxs[2], i ∈ tileaxs[1]
+            I = ri[i,j]
+            u[I] = apply(D, v, (Index{r1}(I[1]), Index{r2}(I[2])))
+        end
+    end
+    return nothing
+end
+
+function apply(D::DiffOp, v::AbstractVector)::AbstractVector
+    u = zeros(eltype(v), size(v))
+    apply!(D,v,u)
+    return u
+end
+
+struct NormalDerivative{N,M,K}
+	op::D2{Float64,N,M,K}
+	grid::EquidistantGrid
+	bId::CartesianBoundary
+end
+
+function apply_transpose(d::NormalDerivative, v::AbstractArray, I::Integer)
+	u = selectdim(v,3-dim(d.bId),I)
+	return apply_d(d.op, d.grid.inverse_spacing[dim(d.bId)], u, region(d.bId))
+end
+
+# Not correct abstraction level
+# TODO: Not type stable D:<
+function apply(d::NormalDerivative, v::AbstractArray, I::Tuple{Integer,Integer})
+	i = I[dim(d.bId)]
+	j = I[3-dim(d.bId)]
+	N_i = d.grid.size[dim(d.bId)]
+
+	r = getregion(i, closureSize(d.op), N_i)
+
+	if r != region(d.bId)
+		return 0
+	end
+
+	if r == Lower
+		# Note, closures are indexed by offset. Fix this D:<
+		return d.grid.inverse_spacing[dim(d.bId)]*d.op.dClosure[i-1]*v[j]
+	elseif r == Upper
+		return d.grid.inverse_spacing[dim(d.bId)]*d.op.dClosure[N_i-j]*v[j]
+	end
+end
+
+struct BoundaryValue{N,M,K}
+	op::D2{Float64,N,M,K}
+	grid::EquidistantGrid
+	bId::CartesianBoundary
+end
+
+function apply(e::BoundaryValue, v::AbstractArray, I::Tuple{Integer,Integer})
+	i = I[dim(e.bId)]
+	j = I[3-dim(e.bId)]
+	N_i = e.grid.size[dim(e.bId)]
+
+	r = getregion(i, closureSize(e.op), N_i)
+
+	if r != region(e.bId)
+		return 0
+	end
+
+	if r == Lower
+		# Note, closures are indexed by offset. Fix this D:<
+		return e.op.eClosure[i-1]*v[j]
+	elseif r == Upper
+		return e.op.eClosure[N_i-j]*v[j]
+	end
+end
+
+function apply_transpose(e::BoundaryValue, v::AbstractArray, I::Integer)
+	u = selectdim(v,3-dim(e.bId),I)
+	return apply_e(e.op, u, region(e.bId))
+end
+
+struct Laplace{Dim,T<:Real,N,M,K} <: DiffOpCartesian{Dim}
+    grid::EquidistantGrid{Dim,T}
+    a::T
+    op::D2{Float64,N,M,K}
+    e::BoundaryValue
+    d::NormalDerivative
+end
+
+function apply(L::Laplace{Dim}, v::AbstractArray{T,Dim} where T, I::CartesianIndex{Dim}) where Dim
+    error("not implemented")
+end
+
+# u = L*v
+function apply(L::Laplace{1}, v::AbstractVector, i::Int)
+    uᵢ = L.a * apply(L.op, L.grid.spacing[1], v, i)
+    return uᵢ
+end
+
+@inline function apply(L::Laplace{2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2} where T, I::Tuple{Index{R1}, Index{R2}}) where {R1, R2}
+    # 2nd x-derivative
+    @inbounds vx = view(v, :, Int(I[2]))
+    @inbounds uᵢ = L.a*apply(L.op, L.grid.inverse_spacing[1], vx , I[1])
+    # 2nd y-derivative
+    @inbounds vy = view(v, Int(I[1]), :)
+    @inbounds uᵢ += L.a*apply(L.op, L.grid.inverse_spacing[2], vy, I[2])
+    return uᵢ
+end
+
+# Slow but maybe convenient?
+function apply(L::Laplace{2}, v::AbstractArray{T,2} where T, i::CartesianIndex{2})
+    I = Index{Unknown}.(Tuple(i))
+    apply(L, v, I)
+end
+
+struct BoundaryOperator
+
+end
+
+
+"""
+A BoundaryCondition should implement the method
+    sat(::DiffOp, v::AbstractArray, data::AbstractArray, ...)
+"""
+abstract type BoundaryCondition end
+
+struct Neumann{Bid<:BoundaryIdentifier} <: BoundaryCondition end
+
+function sat(L::Laplace{2,T}, bc::Neumann{Bid}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}, g::AbstractVector{T}, I::CartesianIndex{2}) where {T,Bid}
+    e = BoundaryValue(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    d = NormalDerivative(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    Hᵧ = BoundaryQuadrature(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    # TODO: Implement BoundaryQuadrature method
+
+    return -L.Hi*e*Hᵧ*(d'*v - g)
+    # Need to handle d'*v - g so that it is an AbstractArray that TensorMappings can act on
+end
+
+struct Dirichlet{Bid<:BoundaryIdentifier} <: BoundaryCondition
+    tau::Float64
+end
+
+function sat(L::Laplace{2,T}, bc::Dirichlet{Bid}, v::AbstractArray{T,2}, g::AbstractVector{T}, i::CartesianIndex{2}) where {T,Bid}
+    e = BoundaryValue(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    d = NormalDerivative(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    Hᵧ = BoundaryQuadrature(L.op, L.grid, Bid())
+    # TODO: Implement BoundaryQuadrature method
+
+    return -L.Hi*(tau/h*e + d)*Hᵧ*(e'*v - g)
+    # Need to handle scalar multiplication and addition of TensorMapping
+end
+
+# function apply(s::MyWaveEq{D},  v::AbstractArray{T,D}, i::CartesianIndex{D}) where D
+# 	return apply(s.L, v, i) +
+# 		sat(s.L, Dirichlet{CartesianBoundary{1,Lower}}(s.tau),  v, s.g_w, i) +
+# 		sat(s.L, Dirichlet{CartesianBoundary{1,Upper}}(s.tau),  v, s.g_e, i) +
+# 		sat(s.L, Dirichlet{CartesianBoundary{2,Lower}}(s.tau),  v, s.g_s, i) +
+# 		sat(s.L, Dirichlet{CartesianBoundary{2,Upper}}(s.tau),  v, s.g_n, i)
+# end