Mercurial > repos > public > sbplib_julia
view src/SbpOperators/volumeops/derivatives/second_derivative.jl @ 989:7bf3121c6864 feature/stencil_set_type
Add type StencilSet
author | Vidar Stiernström <vidar.stiernstrom@it.uu.se> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 17 Mar 2022 21:31:20 +0100 |
parents | 2ae62dbaf839 |
children | b6238afd3bb0 |
line wrap: on
line source
""" second_derivative(grid::EquidistantGrid, inner_stencil, closure_stencils, direction) Creates the second-derivative operator `D2` as a `TensorMapping` `D2` approximates the second-derivative d²/dξ² on `grid` along the coordinate dimension specified by `direction`, using the stencil `inner_stencil` in the interior and a set of stencils `closure_stencils` for the points in the closure regions. On a one-dimensional `grid`, `D2` is a `VolumeOperator`. On a multi-dimensional `grid`, `D2` is the outer product of the one-dimensional operator with the `IdentityMapping`s in orthogonal coordinate dirrections. See also: [`volume_operator`](@ref). """ function second_derivative(grid::EquidistantGrid, inner_stencil, closure_stencils, direction) h_inv = inverse_spacing(grid)[direction] return SbpOperators.volume_operator(grid, scale(inner_stencil,h_inv^2), scale.(closure_stencils,h_inv^2), even, direction) end second_derivative(grid::EquidistantGrid{1}, inner_stencil::Stencil, closure_stencils) = second_derivative(grid,inner_stencil,closure_stencils,1) """ second_derivative(grid, stencil_set, direction) Creates a `second_derivative` operator on `grid` along coordinate dimension `direction` given a `stencil_set`. """ function second_derivative(grid::EquidistantGrid, stencil_set::StencilSet, direction) inner_stencil = parse_stencil(stencil_set["D2"]["inner_stencil"]) closure_stencils = parse_stencil.(stencil_set["D2"]["closure_stencils"]) second_derivative(grid,inner_stencil,closure_stencils,direction); end # TODO: Not possible to remove ::Stencil from second_derivative(grid::EquidistantGrid{1},...) due to type deduction failing. # Is this due to the type ambuguity of StencilSet? Possible to address in some other way? # If not, should we drop ::StencilSet from the method above (it is not required)?