Mercurial > repos > public > sbplib_julia
diff TODO.md @ 297:dfadc0bafbbd
Fix some formatting errors in TODO.md
author | Jonatan Werpers <jonatan@werpers.com> |
---|---|
date | Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:22:27 +0200 |
parents | 4735abcf5d42 |
children | a0ec3cb6a65b |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/TODO.md Mon Jun 22 22:19:10 2020 +0200 +++ b/TODO.md Mon Jun 22 22:22:27 2020 +0200 @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ - [ ] Skriv tester ## Coding -* Add new Laplace opertor to DiffOps, probably named WaveEqOp(?!!?) + - [ ] Add new Laplace opertor to DiffOps, probably named WaveEqOp(?!!?) - [ ] Add 1D operators (D1, D2, e, d ... ) as TensorOperators - [ ] Create a struct that bundles the necessary Tensor operators for solving the wave equation. - [ ] Use traits like IndexStyle, IndexLinear, IndexCartesian to differentiate @@ -17,13 +17,14 @@ - [ ] Redo all Tensor applys to take Vararg instead of tuple of Index? Have we been down that road before? Is there any reason not to do this? - [ ] Check how the native julia doc generator works - * Check if Vidars design docs fit in there + - [ ] Check if Vidars design docs fit in there - [ ] Formalize how range_size() and domain_size() are supposed to work in TensorMappings where dim(domain) != dim(range) (add tests or document) - [x] Should there be some kind of collection struct for SBP operators (as TensorOperators), providing easy access to all parts (D2, e, d , -> YES! H.. H_gamma etc.) - - [x] Is "missing" a good value for unknown dimension sizes (of e*g for example) + - [x] Is "missing" a good value for unknown dimension sizes (of `e*g` for example) # Wrap up task + - [ ] Kolla att vi har @inbounds och @propagate_inbounds på rätt ställen - [ ] Kolla att vi gör boundschecks överallt och att de är markerade med @boundscheck - [ ] Kolla att vi har @inline på rätt ställen