Mercurial > repos > public > sbplib_julia
diff TODO.md @ 318:0c8d4a734c4f
Add some todos and add a Notes.md file
author | Jonatan Werpers <jonatan@werpers.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 10 Sep 2020 10:55:30 +0200 |
parents | 81e8968e222c |
children | 05ac7d7f9176 |
line wrap: on
line diff
--- a/TODO.md Wed Sep 09 22:00:13 2020 +0200 +++ b/TODO.md Thu Sep 10 10:55:30 2020 +0200 @@ -16,15 +16,21 @@ - [ ] Update how dependencies are handled for tests. This was updated in Julia v1.2 and would allow us to use test specific dev packages. ## Reasearch and thinking - - [ ] Redo all Tensor applys to take Vararg instead of tuple of Index? - Have we been down that road before? Is there any reason not to do this? + - [ ] Use a trait to indicate if a TensorMapping uses indices with regions. + The default should be that they do NOT. + - [ ] What to name this trait? Can we call it IndexStyle but not export it to avoid conflicts with Base.IndexStyle? + - [ ] Use a trait to indicate that a TensorMapping har the same range and domain? + - [ ] Rename all the Tensor stuff to just LazyOperator, LazyApplication and so on? + - [ ] Figure out repeated application of regioned TensorMappings. Maybe an instance of a tensor mapping needs to know the exact size of the range and domain for this to work? - [ ] Check how the native julia doc generator works - [ ] Check if Vidars design docs fit in there - [ ] Formalize how range_size() and domain_size() are supposed to work in TensorMappings where dim(domain) != dim(range) (add tests or document) + - [ ] Create a macro @lazy which replaces a binary op (+,-) by its lazy equivalent? Would be a neat way to indicate which evaluations are lazy without cluttering/confusing with special characters. + - [ ] Specificera operatorer i TOML eller något liknande? + - [x] Redo all Tensor applys to take Vararg instead of tuple of Index? - [x] Should there be some kind of collection struct for SBP operators (as TensorOperators), providing easy access to all parts (D2, e, d , -> YES! H.. H_gamma etc.) - [x] Is "missing" a good value for unknown dimension sizes (of `e*g` for example) - - [ ] Create a macro @lazy which replaces a binary op (+,-) by its lazy equivalent? Would be a neat way to indicate which evaluations are lazy without cluttering/confusing with special characters. # Wrap up task @@ -45,4 +51,3 @@ en vektor, utan randvärdet plockas ut utanför. Känns inte konsistent med övrig design -Specificera operatorer i TOML eller något liknande?