Mercurial > repos > public > sbplib_julia
comparison TODO.md @ 295:4735abcf5d42
Rename TODO.txt to TODO.md
| author | Jonatan Werpers <jonatan@werpers.com> |
|---|---|
| date | Mon, 22 Jun 2020 22:18:40 +0200 |
| parents | TODO.txt@9c12d9eb38fd |
| children | dfadc0bafbbd |
comparison
equal
deleted
inserted
replaced
| 294:9c12d9eb38fd | 295:4735abcf5d42 |
|---|---|
| 1 # TODO | |
| 2 | |
| 3 ## Skämskudde | |
| 4 - [ ] Ändra namn på variabler och funktioner så att det följer style-guide | |
| 5 - [ ] Skriv tester | |
| 6 | |
| 7 ## Coding | |
| 8 * Add new Laplace opertor to DiffOps, probably named WaveEqOp(?!!?) | |
| 9 - [ ] Add 1D operators (D1, D2, e, d ... ) as TensorOperators | |
| 10 - [ ] Create a struct that bundles the necessary Tensor operators for solving the wave equation. | |
| 11 - [ ] Use traits like IndexStyle, IndexLinear, IndexCartesian to differentiate | |
| 12 TensorMappings that are flexible in size and those that are fixed in size | |
| 13 - [x] Move Laplace tensor operator to different package | |
| 14 - [x] Remove grid as a property of the Laplace tensor operator | |
| 15 | |
| 16 ## Reasearch and thinking | |
| 17 - [ ] Redo all Tensor applys to take Vararg instead of tuple of Index? | |
| 18 Have we been down that road before? Is there any reason not to do this? | |
| 19 - [ ] Check how the native julia doc generator works | |
| 20 * Check if Vidars design docs fit in there | |
| 21 - [ ] Formalize how range_size() and domain_size() are supposed to work in TensorMappings where dim(domain) != dim(range) (add tests or document) | |
| 22 - [x] Should there be some kind of collection struct for SBP operators (as TensorOperators), providing easy access to all parts (D2, e, d , -> YES! | |
| 23 H.. H_gamma etc.) | |
| 24 - [x] Is "missing" a good value for unknown dimension sizes (of e*g for example) | |
| 25 | |
| 26 # Wrap up task | |
| 27 - [ ] Kolla att vi har @inbounds och @propagate_inbounds på rätt ställen | |
| 28 - [ ] Kolla att vi gör boundschecks överallt och att de är markerade med @boundscheck | |
| 29 - [ ] Kolla att vi har @inline på rätt ställen | |
| 30 - [ ] Profilera | |
| 31 | |
| 32 | |
| 33 # Old stuff todos (Are these still relevant?) | |
| 34 Borde det finns motsvarande apply_stencil för apply_quadrature, | |
| 35 apply_boundary_value och apply_normal_derivative? | |
| 36 | |
| 37 Borde man alltid skicka in N som parameter i apply_2nd_derivative, t.ex som i | |
| 38 apply_quadrature? | |
| 39 | |
| 40 Just nu agerar apply_normal_derivative, apply_boundary_value på inte på v som | |
| 41 en vektor, utan randvärdet plockas ut utanför. Känns inte konsistent med övrig | |
| 42 design | |
| 43 | |
| 44 Specificera operatorer i TOML eller något liknande? |